[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ4mO27NX0ccc7d_zmNoBQbvYZKOYm3NRH7f12HD9=NqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:53:36 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: pinctrl sleep and idle states in the core
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
>
>> +int pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(struct device *dev)
>
>> +int pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(struct device *dev)
>
>> +int pinctrl_pm_select_idle_state(struct device *dev)
>
> The implementation of those 3 functions is basically identical. I'd be
> inclined to move it to a helper function, and just pass (dev,
> pins->xxx_state) to it.
Point taken, but as the comments only affect pinctrl/core.c
and I got so many nice ACKs on the patch, I'll apply this
and think about a refactoring patch only hitting the core
in drivers/pinctrl/* to nice this up. (Need this infrastructure
in place for the OMAP work now I think...)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists