lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130607090543.GD10280@linutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:05:43 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@...escale.com>
Cc:	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, leoli@...escale.com, scottwood@...escale.com,
	Priyanka.Jain@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] kernel/cpu: do not change the cpus_allowed of the
 current task when unplugging cpus

* Zhao Chenhui | 2013-05-16 18:17:19 [+0800]:

>We found a problem. When a cpu is brought down using _cpu_down(),
>the corresponding cpu bit in the cpus_allowed of the current task is
>cleared. But this bit will not be set when the same cpu is online again.
>Then, the current task and its child processes will not be allowed to
>run on this cpu.

Isn't this what should happen? This also happens on mainline if you
leave the RT bits out, right? You should be able to put the task back on
the CPU once the CPU is up again.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ