[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtA=pVQ69pfv97kgcdawgHbQbkbXW4sFGN6_bAzZcD9b9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:07:28 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, riel@...hat.com,
Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/4] sched: change cfs_rq load avg to unsigned long
On 7 June 2013 09:29, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
> Since the 'u64 runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg' in cfs_rq struct are
> smaller than 'unsigned long' cfs_rq->load.weight. We don't need u64
> vaiables to describe them. unsigned long is more efficient and convenience.
>
Hi Alex,
I just want to point out that we can't have more than 48388 tasks with
highest priority on a runqueue with an unsigned long on a 32 bits
system. I don't know if we can reach such kind of limit on a 32bits
machine ? For sure, not on an embedded system.
Regards,
Vincent
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 75024a6..160afdc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -211,9 +211,9 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "load", cfs_rq->load.weight);
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lld\n", "runnable_load_avg",
> + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "runnable_load_avg",
> cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg);
> - SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lld\n", "blocked_load_avg",
> + SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "blocked_load_avg",
> cfs_rq->blocked_load_avg);
> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lld\n", "tg_load_avg",
> (unsigned long long)atomic64_read(&cfs_rq->tg->load_avg));
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 8bc66c6..5a80943 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
> * This allows for the description of both thread and group usage (in
> * the FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case).
> */
> - u64 runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg;
> + unsigned long runnable_load_avg, blocked_load_avg;
> atomic64_t decay_counter, removed_load;
> u64 last_decay;
>
> --
> 1.7.12
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists