[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B1A8A5.8050904@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:32:21 +0200
From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page()
in swap free notify path
On 06/06/2013 06:07 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> zram_slot_free_notify() is free-running without any protection from
> concurrent operations. So there are race conditions between
> zram_bvec_read()/zram_bvec_write() and zram_slot_free_notify(),
> and possible consequences include:
> 1) Trigger BUG_ON(!handle) on zram_bvec_write() side.
> 2) Access to freed pages on zram_bvec_read() side.
> 3) Break some fields (bad_compress, good_compress, pages_stored)
> in zram->stats if the swap layer makes concurrently call to
> zram_slot_free_notify().
>
> So enhance zram_slot_free_notify() to acquire writer lock on zram->lock
> before calling zram_free_page().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchand@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists