| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2482951.doztFClhed@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:36:12 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: shuox.liu@...el.com Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, pavel@....cz, len.brown@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Run callback of device_prepare/complete consistently On Friday, June 07, 2013 04:20:30 PM shuox.liu@...el.com wrote: > dpm_run_callback is used in other stages of power states changing. > It provides debug info message and time measurement when call these > callback. We also want to benefit ->prepare and ->complete. > > [PATCH 1/2] PM: use dpm_run_callback in device_prepare > [PATCH 2/2] PM: add dpm_run_callback_void and use it in device_complete Is this an "Oh, why don't we do that?" series, or is it useful for anything in practice? I'm asking, because we haven't added that stuff to start with since we didn't see why it would be useful to anyone. And while patch [1/2] reduces the code size (by 1 line), so I can see some (tiny) benefit from applying it, patch [2/2] adds more code and is there any paractical reason? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists