lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:13:19 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com> Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: dbx500-prcmu: Correctly reorder PRCMU clock identifiers On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote: > ... as stipulated by the Hardware Specification document. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> I think you need Ulf (as ux500 clock author) and Loic (as PRCMU developer) to have a look at this. > -enum prcmu_clock { > - PRCMU_SGACLK, (...) > +#define ARMCLK 0 > +#define PRCMU_ACLK 1 (...) It seems the enum and the defines want to do two different things? The first is a kernel-internal representation of the clocks, whereas the latter is a HW-centric representation for a certain PRCMU variant (I guess?) Does one actually exclude the other? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists