linux-kernel - Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1370616567.2433.20.camel@jm-desktop>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:49:28 +0000
From:	joem <joem@...tindale-electric.co.uk>
To:	Linux on small ARM machines <arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk>
CC:	"debian-arm@...ts.debian.org" <debian-arm@...ts.debian.org>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org" <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
 Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

> > SoC vendors are free to join the discussion, and many SoC vendors are part
> > of the kernel community, so calling this unilateral is plain wrong.
> 
>  you're free to believe that, vladimir.  i've explained why that
> hasn't happened, in prior messages.  can we move forward, please?

I prefer it if the "vladimir" troll (and fellow trolls)
make requests for one of us to make or do something instead of
constantly whining and wasting time.

After all we are attached to funds and resources ready to
deploy if something sounds a good idea and gets a vote.

To vladimir - please put your thoughts in a blog where it belongs.
If its important, I'm sure others would offer comment
and take you up on your thoughts.