[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130607150352.GS15183@kvack.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:04:28 -0400
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
Subject: Re: [ 150/184] ipv4: check rt_genid in dst_check
Hi Willy,
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:00:57PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:58:06AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:07:33AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This commit is based on the above, with the addition of verifying blackhole
> > > > routes in the same manner.
> > >
> > > That addition doesn't seem to correspond to anything in mainline. Why
> > > should 2.6.32 differ?
> >
> > Fixing the issue with blackhole routes as it was accomplished in mainline
> > would require pulling in a lot more code, and people were not interested
> > in pulling in all of the dependencies given the much higher risk of trying
> > to select the right subset of changes to include. The addition of the
> > single line of "dst->obsolete = -1;" in ipv4_dst_blackhole() was much
> > easier to verify, and is in the spirit of the patch in question. This is
> > the minimal set of changes to fix the bug in question.
>
> Thank you Ben, I'll add this description to the existing commit message.
A link to the test case for this issue might be helpful to include as well.
It is at http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135015076708950&w=2 . Cheers,
-ben
> Best regards,
> Willy
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists