[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130607154102.GB24882@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: david.vrabel@...rix.com, roger.pau@...rix.com,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: Check for insane amounts of request on the
ring.
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.06.13 at 19:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> > @@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ static int xen_blkif_map(struct xen_blkif *blkif, unsigned long shared_page,
> > static void xen_blkif_disconnect(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
> > {
> > if (blkif->xenblkd) {
> > + wake_up(&blkif->shutdown_wq);
> > kthread_stop(blkif->xenblkd);
> > blkif->xenblkd = NULL;
> > }
>
> Btw., wouldn't the wake_up() better be done after the kthread_stop(),
> so that when the corresponding wait_event_interruptible() checks
> whether to exit the terminating kthread_should_stop() is guaranteed
> to evaluate to true (otherwise I think there's potential for it to never
> exit)?
I think you are right. I did the change and the tests were OK.
>
> Jan
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists