linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] USB: cdc-acm: remove unneeded spin_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130607184208.GB7139@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:42:08 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Stoffregen <paul@...c.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] USB: cdc-acm: remove unneeded spin_lock_irqsave/restore
 on write path

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

When writing data we were:
	lock
	do some work
	unlock
	call function
		lock
		do some work
		unlock
		return
	return

It turns out, that "function" was only ever called in the one place, so
instead of locking/unlocking for no good reason, just inline the
function and only grab the lock once.

This has sped up the pathological case of sending 1 byte packets to a
loop-back cdc-acm device from 49600 bytes per second to 50100 bytes a
second on my workstation.  A tiny increase yes, but noticable, and now
the spinlock isn't the hottest thing on the perf graph anymore.  Yes, we
are still waiting for the hardware for the most part, but getting rid of
a spinlock_irq_save() call for every packet is still a good thing.

And we end up deleting lines of code, always a win overall.

This was found by using a Teensy 3.0 device and the test program and
firmware located at:
	http://www.pjrc.com/teensy/benchmark_usb_serial_receive.html

Reported-by: Paul Stoffregen <paul@...c.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 Changes v1 - v2:
   - move unlock farther down the call to where it needed to be.


 drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c |   52 ++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
@@ -216,38 +216,6 @@ static int acm_start_wb(struct acm *acm,
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int acm_write_start(struct acm *acm, int wbn)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	struct acm_wb *wb = &acm->wb[wbn];
-	int rc;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&acm->write_lock, flags);
-	if (!acm->dev) {
-		wb->use = 0;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	dev_vdbg(&acm->data->dev, "%s - susp_count %d\n", __func__,
-							acm->susp_count);
-	usb_autopm_get_interface_async(acm->control);
-	if (acm->susp_count) {
-		if (!acm->delayed_wb)
-			acm->delayed_wb = wb;
-		else
-			usb_autopm_put_interface_async(acm->control);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
-		return 0;	/* A white lie */
-	}
-	usb_mark_last_busy(acm->dev);
-
-	rc = acm_start_wb(acm, wb);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
-
-	return rc;
-
-}
 /*
  * attributes exported through sysfs
  */
@@ -653,13 +621,31 @@ static int acm_tty_write(struct tty_stru
 	}
 	wb = &acm->wb[wbn];
 
+	if (!acm->dev) {
+		wb->use = 0;
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
 	count = (count > acm->writesize) ? acm->writesize : count;
 	dev_vdbg(&acm->data->dev, "%s - write %d\n", __func__, count);
 	memcpy(wb->buf, buf, count);
 	wb->len = count;
+
+	usb_autopm_get_interface_async(acm->control);
+	if (acm->susp_count) {
+		if (!acm->delayed_wb)
+			acm->delayed_wb = wb;
+		else
+			usb_autopm_put_interface_async(acm->control);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
+		return count;	/* A white lie */
+	}
+	usb_mark_last_busy(acm->dev);
+
+	stat = acm_start_wb(acm, wb);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
 
-	stat = acm_write_start(acm, wbn);
 	if (stat < 0)
 		return stat;
 	return count;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/