lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 20:52:34 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Ike Pan <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
	David Marlin <dmarlin@...hat.com>,
	Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@...vell.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
	Dan Frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
	Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@...vell.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@....com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Chris Van Hoof <vanhoof@...onical.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maen Suleiman <maen@...vell.com>,
	Shadi Ammouri <shadi@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mvebu: Add the i2c-bridge capability to
	the mv64xxx-i2c

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:42:23PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> The mv64xxx-i2c embedded in the Armada XP have a new feature called
> i2c-bridge. This commit split the i2c information into armada-370.dtsi
> and armada-xp.dtsi. Most of the data remains the same and stay in the
> common file Armada-370-xp.dtsi. With this new feature the size of the
> registers are bigger for Armada XP and for this SoCs we add a new flag
> for the i2c-bridge capability.

Personally, I don't like this "i2c-bridge" flag either, but for a different
reason - i2c-bridge makes it sound like it's doing something it's not.

What it is doing is as you stated in the cover - it's an offload mechanism,
just like if it were possible to use DMA to supply the data to the I2C
interface.

I think Maxime is correct - this should be identified by a variation in
the compatible string, not by a flag in DT.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ