[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B2E4FD.4000708@asianux.com>
Date:	Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:02:05 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, shli@...ionio.com,
	"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: x86: include: asm: need 'unsigned' type cast for
 atomic_clear_mask()
On 06/08/2013 03:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/07/2013 11:30 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> > 
>> > atomic_set_mask() has already have 'unsigned' type case, and
>> > atomic_clear_mask() is the pair of atomic_set_mask().
>> > 
>> > So it also need 'unsigned' type case.
>> > 
> Pray tell, in what situation does this matter?  The only reason I can
> think of is if "mask" is actually a long...
Excuse me, in fact, I don't know whether it will cause issue. Since
atomic_set_mask() has done, I think atomic_clear_mask() also need it.
If atomic_clear_mask() do need it, the atomic_set_mask() do not need it
either, they are the pairs --> they will face the same situation.
Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
