linux-kernel - Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPweEDx2m800s+PTMd3vmmKv1ODz0soJp-YdvJnRNY5j7oCfVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:30:26 +0100
From:	"luke.leighton" <luke.leighton@...il.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	debian-arm@...ts.debian.org,
	"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Linux on small ARM machines 
	<arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
 Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:09:59PM +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> this is all a rather round-about way to say that for those people who
>> heard and are thinking of heeding russell's call to "be silent and to
>> ignore me"
>
> Okay, so you've just misrepresented me in the above comment.  I never
> said anything of the sort.  The closest that I've come to a comment like
> that is asking you to stop wasting people's time.

 close enough.

> So, given your displayed inability to properly convey what people have
> said to you in a discussion in your own replies, is there *any* reason
> that anyone should trust you to communicate their position to any other
> third party?

 trust is always something that has to be given, russell.  respect is
earned, but trust is given.  many make the mistake of believing that
trust is earned [people who seek to defeat others as "enemies" know
this and exploit it to devastating effect].

 so i can't answer your question directly, but consider this: the
people that i work with have known me for a long time.  they know i'm
a bit of a live wire (you saw that wookey called me "crazy luke") and
they often go as completely spare at some of the spanners i throw in
the works just as everyone else does.  it's *they* who will be doing
all the talking, and i will be advising them in the background over
the next week so that *technically* they're prepped.

 everyone has a different role to play here.

/peace

l.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/