[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130610091012.GR18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:10:12 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Chris Johnson <CJohnson@...dia.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Karan Jhavar <kjhavar@...dia.com>,
Matthew Longnecker <MLongnecker@...dia.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: add basic SecureOS support
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:47:22PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> One could remove the naked attribute and put there registers into the
> clobber list, but then the function will be inlined and we will have
> to ensure the parameters end up in the right register (and having a
> function that cannot be inlined is convenient in that respect). So as
> far as I can tell, having the function naked and saving the registers
> ourselves seems to be the most convenient way around this.
If you use such a large clobber list, you risk the compiler barfing on
you that it's run out of registers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists