[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130610091724.GG20297@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:17:24 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/39] ARM: ux500: Move SDI (MMC) and UART devices under
more descriptive heading
On Wed, 15 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > Now DMA DT bindings exist and are in use by he MMC and UART drivers, it
> > should be possible to remove them from the auxdata structure. However,
> > after doing so the drivers fail. Common clk is still reliant on the
> > dev_name() call to do device name matching, which will fail due to the
> > fact that Device Tree naming differs somewhat do the more traditional
> > conventions.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>
> Cannot be applied due to dependency on 5/39.
I think this can be applied now (if it hasn't already).
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists