linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add dtsi for palmas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51B59C8B.9000405@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:29:47 +0200
From:	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>
To:	"J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@...com>
CC:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ldewangan@...dia.com" <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"swarren@...dia.com" <swarren@...dia.com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add dtsi for palmas

Hi Keerthy,

On 06/10/2013 06:03 AM, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Thanks for the review comments.
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Stephen Warren [swarren@...dotorg.org]
> Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 1:26 AM
> To: J, KEERTHY
> Cc: Cousson, Benoit; devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-omap@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; ldewangan@...dia.com; grant.likely@...retlab.ca; swarren@...dia.com; sameo@...ux.intel.com; gg@...mlogic.co.uk; lee.jones@...aro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add dtsi for palmas
> 
> On 06/07/2013 05:28 AM, J Keerthy wrote:
>> Adds palmas mfd and palmas regulator nodes. This is
>> based on the patch series:
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg89957.html
>>
>> The device tree nodes are based on:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/6/25
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/palmas.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/palmas.dtsi
> 
>> +&palmas {
> 
> Hmmm. That (i.e. requiring the board file to declare the node, then
> setting up all the content by later including this file) is an
> interesting approach. I guess it's reasonable. The one issue is that it
> makes it a little harder for the board file to override any of the
> properties in this file., although it certainly is possible by including
> those overrides after the include.
> 
> Irrespective of that, some comments on this:
> 
>> +     palmas_pmic {
> 
>> +             ti,ldo6-vibrator;
> 
> For example, what if the board doesn't want to have the property set?
> 
>> +
>> +             regulators {
>> +                     smps123_reg: smps123 {
>> +                             regulator-name = "smps123";
>> +                             regulator-min-microvolt = < 600000>;
>> +                             regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>;
> 
> Or what if the board wants to limit the voltage range of this regulator
> due to what it's used for on the board.
> 
>> +                             regulator-always-on;
>> +                             regulator-boot-on;
> 
> And those two properties are almost certainly board-specific policy.
> 
> Totally agree to all the above concerns. So can we have a custom .dtsi file
> for a board+pmic combination? Or have only the required properties over ridden
> in the board file?

Yes, you can do that potentially if most OMAP5 boards will reuse the
same kind of settings. Kevin has just done that for OMAP3 + twl4030.

In this case, since we do have only one board, I'm not sure it worth the
effort.

Regards,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/