[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaV0ipY4mYHt998D=NNKrpDaFhCA949V0-93NkOKcvHyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:52:13 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard.st@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: common handling of generic pinconfig props
in dt
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> following your suggestions for a common handling of things like pulls in dt,
> I've come up with the following solution - hopefully I've gotten the correct
> meaning of your explanaitions.
>
> It handles all the pinconfigs that either ignore the argument, or have very
> simple one, like PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT does.
OK patches applied. It needs some rough fixes like NULL check
on kmalloc() but it'll do for a starter. Now I can tell everyone to
use this and refer to it.
> I've also attached my current rockchip pinctrl driver to show how it is using
> this currently.
OK I might just merge it. If you take the rest of the patches through
ARM SoC they will need to pull in my tree anyway if it's intended to
go in this merge window.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists