linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] regulator: ab8500-ext: Refactorings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130610152507.GF1403@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:25:07 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] regulator: ab8500-ext: Refactorings

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:12:08PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> The 'ux500: regulator_supply' patch, relies on the 'regulator:
> supply_name' one however. Mark has taken two of them, I don't know why
> the others were missed/intentionally left.

> Mark, was there a reason for this?

IIRC they were more involved and since you decided to pick a random
e-mail address to send them to that goes nowhere near the mailboxes I
use for upstream they're not going to bubble up particularly quickly.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)