[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1370837061.21655.54.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:04:21 +0800
From: li guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/3] add cpu physically hotplug driver
在 2013-06-10一的 12:51 +0900,Yasuaki Ishimatsu写道:
> 2013/06/10 9:36, li guang wrote:
> > Hi, Rafael
> >
> > 在 2013-06-06四的 13:00 +0200,Rafael J. Wysocki写道:
> >> On Thursday, June 06, 2013 09:40:32 AM liguang wrote:
> >>> This patch-set try to support physically hot-plug/unplug
> >>> a cpu automatically, that is:
> >>> if you offline a cpu, it will automatically actually remove
> >>> a cpu, and if you hot-plug a cpu, then it will online this
> >>> cpu automatically.
> >>
> >> No and no.
> >
> > Hmm... are you saying cpu online/offline designed to distinguish
> > with real cpu plug/unplug?
> > but, what the actual usage of online/offline?
> > forgive my foolish.
> >
> >>
> >> Why do you need this?
> >>
> >
> > e.g. for QEMU case, if hot-plug a cpu,
>
> > we have to online a cpu manually if there's
> > no user space support like udev to do it automatically.
>
> I could not understand why you do not use udev.
> Please explain in detail.
I did not say I can't use udev now,
just for in case someone can't.
>
> > and also, I think maybe online/offline should be naturally
> > integrated with real plug/unplug process of CPU.
>
> I could not understand this explanation too.
> Why do we need it?
>
actually, I am asking if CPU online/offline have real purpose,
you offline a CPU, then threads can't run on it,
you online a CPU, then threads can run on it,
so, the purpose here is just bouncing threads?
obviously not, any profound historical reasons?
I boldly think maybe online/offline should be integrated into
real plug/unplug process of CPU.
Thanks!
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> so, offline is just like eject, but eject attribute seems not
> >>> available since recent kernel(can't figure out when), with
> >>> this driver, if allowed, it will trigger a eject cpu process.
> >>> and for automatically online, it was said there are objections,
> >>> don't know the reason, so, send this patch-set boldly.
> >>>
> >>> of course, this approach is for QEMU 's hotplug cpu emulation
> >>> only, but not limited, if someone like to explore ec space to
> >>> implment cpu hot-plug/unplug for real platform please
> >>> feel free to continue.
> >>>
> >>> Li Guang (3)
> >>> drivers/platform/x86: add cpu physically hotplug driver
> >>> ec: add ec space notifier
> >>> cpu_physic_hotplug: register handler for ec space notifier
> >>>
> >>> drivers/acpi/ec.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 8 ++++
> >>> drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> drivers/platform/x86/cpu_physic_hotplug.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 ++
> >>> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/cpu_physic_hotplug.c
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists