[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4092650.9kTauzjmyN@flatron>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:34:44 +0200
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
patches@...aro.org, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: Add FIMD node to Origen4210 board
On Monday 10 of June 2013 09:44:14 Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 06/08/2013 04:19 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Friday 07 of June 2013 16:37:14 Tushar Behera wrote:
> >> From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> Added FIMD and display timing node to Origen4210 board.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts index bcf8079..4c6c3cd
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-origen.dts
> >> @@ -290,4 +290,25 @@
> >>
> >> clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> +
> >> + fimd@...00000 {
> >> + pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_en &lcd_clk &lcd_data24 &pwm0_out>;
> >
> > Ahh, this would explain the two pwm pin groups from previous patch.
> >
> > This seems somehow incorrect, though. AFAIK PWM outputs are not
> > managed by FIMD in any way.
>
> I couldn't find any better place to put the pwm0_out pin configurations.
> Without configuring pwm0_out pins, display doesn't come up on the LCD.
> Any suggestions?
Isn't there a PWM backlight driver? With my [PATCH 00/15] Final Samsung
PWM support cleanup patches, a DT-compatible PWM driver is being added, so
it should be possible to use it in your case.
> >> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> + status = "okay";
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + display-timings {
> >> + native-mode = <&timing0>;
> >> + timing0: timing {
> >> + clock-frequency = <50000>;
> >
> > Hmm, 50 KHz for pixel clock? Isn't it a bit too low? Or am I missing
> > something?
>
> Actually clock-frequency value is not used by DRM-FIMD, but instead
> required by the framework.
>
> Still it would be better to provide the actual pixel clock value here.
> So I would update this with 40MHz which is actual pixel clock used on my
> board.
Yes, I think this is a much better idea.
Thanks,
Tomasz
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz
> >
> >> + hactive = <1024>;
> >> + vactive = <600>;
> >> + hfront-porch = <64>;
> >> + hback-porch = <16>;
> >> + hsync-len = <48>;
> >> + vback-porch = <64>;
> >> + vfront-porch = <16>;
> >> + vsync-len = <3>;
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >>
> >> };
>
> Thanks for your review.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists