[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130610203641.GA26036@mithrandir>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:36:42 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory: tegra20-mc: Fix hang in IRQ handler.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:13:43PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
> In Tegra20 memory controller any MC interrupt would cause an
> infinite loop in the IRQ handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <ttynkkynen@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/memory/tegra20-mc.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra20-mc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra20-mc.c
> index 2ca5f28..bd5a553 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra20-mc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra20-mc.c
> @@ -193,8 +193,11 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra20_mc_isr(int irq, void *data)
> mask &= stat;
> if (!mask)
> return IRQ_NONE;
> - while ((bit = ffs(mask)) != 0)
> + while ((bit = ffs(mask)) != 0) {
> tegra20_mc_decode(mc, bit - 1);
> + mask &= BIT(bit);
Shouldn't this be "mask &= ~BIT(bit);"? The intent of the code is to
clear the bit which was handled by the loop body, right? The above
clears all other bits instead.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists