[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1370905376.9844.137.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:02:56 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC ticketlock] Auto-queued ticketlock
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 12:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> +/*
> + * Return a pointer to the queue header associated with the specified lock,
> + * or return NULL if there is no queue for the lock or if the lock's queue
> + * is in transition.
> + */
> +static struct tkt_q_head *tkt_q_find_head(arch_spinlock_t *asp)
BTW, what does "asp" mean? arch_spinlock? If so, can we just call it
"lock" and be consistent with all the other spinlock calls in the
kernel. Because, I keep thinking this has something to do with Microsoft
dynamic web pages.
-- Steve
> +{
> + int i;
> + int start;
> +
> + start = i = tkt_q_hash(asp);
> + do
> + if (tkt_q_heads[i].ref == asp)
> + return &tkt_q_heads[i];
> + while ((i = tkt_q_next_slot(i)) != start);
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists