[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B57266.9050107@de.bosch.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:29:58 +0200
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
To: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...aoptical.com>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"cjb@...top.org" <cjb@...top.org>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MMC: FSL SDHC: Add support for hard-wired (permanent)
card. Kernel version 3.4.47
On 02.06.2013 08:38, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> This patch adds support of recognizing hard-wired (permanent) cards
> to Freescale's SDHC host driver. This is done by adding the option
> "fsl,card-wired" to the SDHC device-tree entry. Detection of this
> option is done in the probe function. Update documentation in file
> fsl-esdhc.txt
Why don't you want to introduce "fsl,card-wired"? Why don't you use
"non-removable"?
To my understanding the patch
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7f217794ffa72f208a250b79ab0b7ea3de19677f
explicitly removed "fsl,card-wired". So I don't think re-introducing it
is a good idea?
Best regards
Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists