[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1370941408-29304-4-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:03:28 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: "cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support
boost framework
The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the information
related to boost support.
When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, the
low_level_boost pointer is filled with proper address. The
.low_level_boost field filled to NULL, indicates that boost is not
supported.
Operations of exynos_cpufreq_boost_trigger() function are protected with
"local" mutex.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
---
Changes for v2:
- Removal of struct cpufreq_boost
- Removal of the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST flag
- low_level_boost with valid address when boost is supported
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 3197d88..8cf5636 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
static unsigned int locking_frequency;
static bool frequency_locked;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_lock);
+static struct cpufreq_cpuinfo *cpufreq_cpu_info;
static int exynos_verify_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
@@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver;
static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation)
@@ -244,6 +246,9 @@ static struct notifier_block exynos_cpufreq_nb = {
static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
+ unsigned int max_freq;
+ int ret;
+
policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = exynos_getspeed(policy->cpu);
cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(exynos_info->freq_table, policy->cpu);
@@ -253,7 +258,19 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
cpumask_setall(policy->cpus);
- return cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, exynos_info->freq_table);
+ ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, exynos_info->freq_table);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (exynos_driver.low_level_boost) {
+ /* disable boost by default */
+ max_freq = cpufreq_frequency_table_max(exynos_info->freq_table,
+ 0);
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max = max_freq;
+ cpufreq_cpu_info = &policy->cpuinfo;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -264,9 +281,32 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static struct freq_attr *exynos_cpufreq_attr[] = {
&cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
+ &cpufreq_freq_attr_boost_available_freqs,
NULL,
};
+static int exynos_cpufreq_boost_trigger(int state)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = container_of(cpufreq_cpu_info,
+ struct cpufreq_policy,
+ cpuinfo);
+ unsigned int max_freq;
+
+ mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
+ exynos_driver.boost_en = state;
+
+ /* Recalculate maximal frequency */
+ max_freq = cpufreq_frequency_table_max(exynos_info->freq_table,
+ exynos_driver.boost_en);
+
+ if (policy->max != max_freq)
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max = max_freq;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
.verify = exynos_verify_speed,
@@ -275,7 +315,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
.init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
.exit = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
.name = "exynos_cpufreq",
- .attr = exynos_cpufreq_attr,
+ .attr = exynos_cpufreq_attr,
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
.suspend = exynos_cpufreq_suspend,
.resume = exynos_cpufreq_resume,
@@ -359,6 +399,8 @@ static struct of_device_id exynos_cpufreq_of_match[] __initconst = {
static int __init exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+
int ret = -EINVAL;
exynos_info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct exynos_dvfs_info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -391,6 +433,9 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
+ if (of_property_read_bool(node, "boost_mode"))
+ exynos_driver.low_level_boost =
+ &exynos_cpufreq_boost_trigger;
register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb);
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists