[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1306111539310.22970@ionos>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:45:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] irqchip: add support for Marvell Orion SoCs
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 06/11/13 15:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch adds an irqchip driver for the main interrupt controller
> > > > found
> > > > on Marvell Orion SoCs (Kirkwood, Dove, Orion5x, Discovery Innovation).
> > > > Corresponding device tree documentation is also added.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >
> > Second thoughts:
> >
> > > +static void orion_bridge_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc
> > > *desc)
> > > +{
> > > + struct irq_domain *d = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
> > > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, irq);
> > > + u32 stat = readl_relaxed(gc->reg_base + ORION_BRIDGE_IRQ_CAUSE) &
> > > + gc->mask_cache;
> >
> > In init you map the first irq of that chip and install the chain
> > handler for it. Now if that first irq fires, isn't that set in the
> > cause register as well? And what acks that first irq?
>
> It is "acked" by acking all unmasked bridge irqs.
Ok. A comment would be nice.
But what about the bit in of that first irq in the cause register? If
it's set on entry you call generic_handle_irq() for that as well. So
if it's set you need to mask it in stat. If not, then it wants a
comment.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists