[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B743EA.5020800@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:36:10 +0100
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@...citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missing an 'XenbusStateClosing'.
On 06/10/2013 10:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> There are two tool-stack that can instruct the Xen PCI frontend
> and backend to change states: 'xm' (Python code with a daemon),
> and 'xl' (C library - does not keep state changes).
>
> With the 'xm', the path to disconnect a PCI device (xm pci-detach
> <guest> <BDF>)is:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)->5(Closing*).
>
> The * is for states that the tool-stack sets. For 'xl', it is similar:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)
>
> Both of them also tear down the XenBus structure, so the backend
> state ends up going in the 3(Initialised) and calls pcifront_xenbus_remove.
So I looked a little bit into this; there are actually two different
states that happen as part of this handshake. In order to disonnect a
*device*, xl signals using the *bus* state, like this:
* Wait for the *bus* to be in state 4(Connected)
* Set the *device* state to 5(Closing)
* Set the *bus* state to 7(Reconfiguring)
* Wait for the *bus* state to return to 4(Connected)
So are all of these states you see the *bus* state? And why would you
disconnect the whole pci bus if you're only removing one device?
-George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists