[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130611003712.GA9537@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:37:12 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1605
__ftrace_hash_rec_update.part.37+0x20a/0x240()
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 08:33:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 19:48 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > 3.10-rc5 + the two patches referenced in the RCU thread from earlier.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > [ 2313.381283] WARNING: at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:1605 __ftrace_hash_rec_update.part.37+0x20a/0x240()
>
> Grumble,
>
> Somehow the list of functions that perf enabled got out of sync with
> what ftrace had. When perf disabled its list of functions from ftrace,
> perf thought it had a function enabled that wasn't and ftrace cried
> about that.
>
> What does 'trinity-child2' do?
Same as all the other child processes. Random syscalls, semi-intelligent args.
> and is this reproducible?
I'm sure I'll hit it again eventually. The This one looks tricky because
the trace isn't a syscall that I can go hammer on, it's happening
at process exit time.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists