[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <002e01ce6668$f785dc20$e6919460$@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:00:25 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: 'Jason Gunthorpe' <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
'Thomas Petazzoni' <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
'Siva Reddy Kallam' <siva.kallam@...sung.com>,
'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla' <suren.reddy@...sung.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
'Thierry Reding' <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Grant Likely' <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
'Kukjin Kim' <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
'Bjorn Helgaas' <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
'Andrew Murray' <andrew.murray@....com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung
EXYNOS5440 SoC
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2013, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 08, 2013 2:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > For multiple domains, how can I fix the DT properties?
>
> Domains are a Linux concept, you have to pick a new domain number for each
> struct hw_pci you register.
Hi Arnd,
Thank you for your reply.
It is very helpful. :)
I will set domain numbers for each struct hw_pci.
>
> > Current DT properties are as below:
> >
> > + pcie0@...00000 {
> > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> > + reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
> > + 0x290000 0x1000
> > + 0x270000 0x1000
> > + 0x271000 0x40>;
> > + interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> > + #address-cells = <3>;
> > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > + device_type = "pci";
> > + ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000 /* configuration space */
> > + 0x81000000 0 0 0x40200000 0 0x00004000 /* downstream I/O */
> > + 0x82000000 0 0 0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> > + };
>
> An unrelated comment: your first "reg" field seems to overlap with part
> of your configuration space. Is that intentional?
Yes, intentional.
But, I will try to remove it.
>
> Also, shouldn't your memory space end on a 256MB boundary, rather than
> extend up to 0x50203fff?
According to the manual of Exynos PCIe, each memory space for Exynos PCIe
can support 512MB, including I/O, CFG regions.
Is there any problem when over 256MB boundary is used?
Please let me know. :)
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
>
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists