linux-kernel - Re: adopt(pid_t pid) syscall proposal [patch included]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:48:22 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@....EDU>
To:	vcaputo@...generation.com
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: adopt(pid_t pid) syscall proposal [patch included]

On 06/10/2013 06:23 PM, vcaputo@...generation.com wrote:
> +			if (!uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->suid) &&
> +			    !uid_eq(cred->euid, tcred->uid)  &&
> +			    !uid_eq(cred->uid,  tcred->suid) &&
> +			    !uid_eq(cred->uid,  tcred->uid) &&
> +			    !ns_capable(cred->user_ns, CAP_KILL)) {
> +				ret = -EPERM;
> +				goto out_unlock;
> +			}
> +

That check's far too permissive.

This sounds like it will break anything that uses wait and expects its 
children to not be stolen out from under it.

Also, you'll have problems with screen -x or the default tmux shareable 
configuration.  It sounds like this is better done in userspace.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/