[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130611195323.607655857@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:03:23 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@...el.com>
Subject: [ 57/79] drm/i915: Fix spurious -EIO/SIGBUS on wedged gpus
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
commit 7abb690a0e095717420ba78dcab4309abbbec78a upstream.
Chris Wilson noticed that since
commit 1f83fee08d625f8d0130f9fe5ef7b17c2e022f3c [v3.9]
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Date: Thu Nov 15 17:17:22 2012 +0100
drm/i915: clear up wedged transitions
X can again get -EIO when it does not expect it. And even worse score
a SIGBUS when accessing gtt mmaps. The established ABI is that we
_only_ return an -EIO from execbuf - all other ioctls should just
work. And since the reset code moves all bos out of gpu domains and
clears out all the last_seqno/ring tracking there really shouldn't be
any reason for non-execbuf code to ever touch the hw and see an -EIO.
After some extensive discussions we've noticed that these spurios -EIO
are caused by i915_gem_wait_for_error:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg20540.html
That is easy to fix by returning 0 instead of -EIO, since grabbing the
dev->struct_mutex does not yet mean that we actually want to touch the
hw. And so there is no reason at all to fail with -EIO.
But that's not the entire since, since often (at least it's easily
googleable) dmesg indicates that the reset fails and we declare the
gpu wedged. Then, quite a bit later X wakes up with the "Timed out
waiting for the gpu reset to complete" DRM_ERROR message in
wait_for_errror and brings down the desktop with an -EIO/SIGBUS.
So clearly we're missing a wakeup somewhere, since the gpu reset just
doesn't take 10 seconds to complete. And indeed we're do handle the
terminally wedged state wrong.
Fix this all up.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -91,14 +91,11 @@ i915_gem_wait_for_error(struct i915_gpu_
{
int ret;
-#define EXIT_COND (!i915_reset_in_progress(error))
+#define EXIT_COND (!i915_reset_in_progress(error) || \
+ i915_terminally_wedged(error))
if (EXIT_COND)
return 0;
- /* GPU is already declared terminally dead, give up. */
- if (i915_terminally_wedged(error))
- return -EIO;
-
/*
* Only wait 10 seconds for the gpu reset to complete to avoid hanging
* userspace. If it takes that long something really bad is going on and
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists