[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponeWuaXPah4s9GjO-fLwQNuyKidUFosN1iE+e7bngDPdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:01:23 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, njiang1@...vell.com,
zjwu@...vell.com, ylmao@...vell.com, chenxg.marvell@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: fix governor start/stop race condition
On 12 June 2013 14:39, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@...vell.com> wrote:
> ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
We again reached to the same problem. We shouldn't call
this between taking locks, otherwise recursive locks problems
would be seen again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists