[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130612010435.8816.19733@quantum>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:04:35 -0700
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix some uses of clk->rate
Quoting Peter De Schrijver (2013-06-05 08:06:34)
> Using clk->rate directly does not take the CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flag into
> account. This can cause wrong results if the flag is set.
>
> Peter De Schrijver (2):
> clk: use clk_get_rate() for debugfs
> clk: honor CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE in clk_set_rate
>
Pulled into clk-next.
Thanks!
Mike
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.7.rc0.72.g4b5ea.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists