[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130612095443.GU4107@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:24:43 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>,
Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: fix error return code
in d40_probe()
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:14:16AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:41:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
> >> >
> >> > In many of the error handling case, the return value 'ret' not set
> >> > and 0 will be return from d40_probe() even if error, but we should
> >> > return a negative error code instead in those error handling case.
> >> > This patch fixed them, and also removed useless variable 'err'.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
> >> > ---
> >> > v1 -> v2: rebased on linux-next.git
> >>
> >> I've tentatively applied this to my dma40 branch, waiting for Vinod
> >> to ACK it.
> > I though you wanted me to apply this :)
> >
> > Nevertheless, Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
> >
> > Can you CC stable too, pls.
>
> Hm I'm not sending any DMA40 stuff for stable, sorry ...
> if you want it to go into stable you'd better pick this
> (the v3 version) into the DMA tree.
okay
>
> Let me know how you want it, I've removed it from my
> dma40 branch for the time being.
Have you removed, Also I see a v3 of this, do you want to ack that before I
apply
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists