[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B86FA3.1030306@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:54:59 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Avner Ben Hanoch <avnerb@...lanox.com>,
Or Kehati <ork@...lanox.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] net: add socket option for low latency
polling
On 12/06/2013 15:44, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 14:20 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:
>> adds a socket option for low latency polling.
>> This allows overriding the global sysctl value with a per-socket one.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>
> It seems EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysctl_net_ll_poll) can now be removed ?
I think we would need it for poll.
Poll needs a way that is not dependent on any individual socket to know
how long to busy-wait, since we have to know it before we poll any
individual socket.
The patch I have right now for poll is not ready (and not fully tested).
But I can post it as an RFC if you want.
-Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists