[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130612151915.GD5332@somewhere>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:19:17 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Mats Liljegren <liljegren.mats2@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Full dynticks selftests 0.0.1
Hi all,
I've been using a homemade test for full dynticks all that time and I regret I haven't shared
it much sooner. I've been asked for such a tool many times and getting full dynticks working
correctly is often not a piece of cake.
Here it is, a very basic test that runs a userspace loop for ten seconds and dumps a trace
of the tick, scheduler, workqueue, and other kind of kernel noise.
You can fetch from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/dynticks-testing.git
master
I hope it helps! Feel free to send any kind of improvements if you wish.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists