linux-kernel - Re: ext4 extent status tree LRU locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51B8B54D.2040200@sr71.net>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:52:13 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	gnehzuil.liu@...il.com
Subject: Re: ext4 extent status tree LRU locking

FWIW, I'm also seeing this contention to a much smaller extent on much
more "normal" hardware.  I've got a 6-core (as opposed to 80) desktop
machine where I'm doing the same test on a real disk (instead of a
loopback-mounted ramfs file).

I'm seeing _about_ 10% CPU time being used on just spinning on the same
ext4 LRU lock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/