[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B8D59B.1040801@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:10:03 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Simon Brown <lists@...c.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Accessing more than 2GB of memory with a 32 bit kernel
On 06/12/2013 12:54 PM, Simon Brown wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For the sake of an old prototype peripheral I'm using a non PAE 32 bit
> x86 kernel and I'm having trouble accessing memory above 2 GB. The
> system has 4GB installed and all is well with a PAE kernel.
>
> I'm obviously expecting to lose some memory due to memory mapped devices
> but I wasn't expecting to lose 2GB. Instead I'm suspecting a BIOS bug.
> The system reports:
> free -m
> total used free shared buffers
> cached
> Mem: 2012 491 1521 0 40
> 277
>
> The mtrr table looked odd so I enabled sanitisation:
> [ 0.000000] original variable MTRRs
> [ 0.000000] reg 0, base: 2GB, range: 2GB, type UC
> [ 0.000000] reg 1, base: 0GB, range: 4GB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] reg 2, base: 4GB, range: 2GB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] total RAM covered: 4096M
> [ 0.000000] Found optimal setting for mtrr clean up
> [ 0.000000] gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K num_reg: 2
> lose cover RAM: 0G
> [ 0.000000] New variable MTRRs
> [ 0.000000] reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 2GB, type WB
> [ 0.000000] reg 1, base: 4GB, range: 2GB, type WB
>
> I don't understand the gap in the new table.
Check the e820 table. Chances are the BIOS is reserving 2GB to
map various devices (especially video cards) below the 4GB limit.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists