[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130612205500.GE6151@google.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:55:00 -0700
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <theo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH percpu/for-3.11] percpu-refcount: consistently use plain
(non-sched) RCU
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:40:32PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> From e96262150a513ce3d54ff221d4ace8aeec96e0bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:37:42 -0700
>
> percpu_ref_get/put() are using preempt_disable/enable() while
> percpu_ref_kill() is using plain call_rcu() instead of
> call_rcu_sched(). This is buggy as grace periods of the two may not
> match. Fix it by using plain RCU in percpu_ref_get/put().
>
> (I suggested using sched RCU in the first place but there's no actual
> benefit in doing so unless we're gonna introduce different variants
> of get/put to be called while preemption is alredy disabled, which we
> definitely shouldn't.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists