[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1371073826.18413.52@snotra>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:50:26 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@...chenk.de>
CC: Michael Guntsche <michael.guntsche@...loops.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] PCI related panic on powerpc based board with 3.10-rcX
On 06/12/2013 03:19:30 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2013 12:28:59 Scott Wood wrote:
> > Yes, I figured it was non-PCIe because the code change that you said
> > helped was on the non-PCIe branch of the if/else. Generally it's
> good
> > to explicitly mention the chip you're using, though.
> >
> > fsl_setup_indirect_pci should be renamed to fsl_setup_indirect_pcie.
> > Your patch above should be applied, and fsl_setup_indirect_pcie
> should
> > be moved into the booke/86xx ifdef to avoid an unused function
> warning.
> >
> > -Scott
>
> How about this patch? It uses setup_indirect_pci for the PCI case in
> mpc83xx_add_bridge. Additionally it adds a check in
> fsl_setup_indirect_pci
> to only use the modified read function in case of PCIe.
If we're adding the check to fsl_setup_indirect_pci, there's no need to
change the 83xx call back to setup_indirect_pci. I see that 85xx is
also callirng fsl_setup_indirect_pci for both; it'd be good to be
consistent.
In any case, can you send a proper patch with a signoff and commit
message?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists