linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pwm: Fill in missing .owner fields

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51B8F729.7030907@metafoo.de>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:33:13 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: Fill in missing .owner fields

On 06/12/2013 09:59 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
>>> struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.
>>
>>
>> Recently a patch [1] was added to solve this issue of missing .owner
>> fileds in struct platform_driver.
> 
> Yes I saw that, but thought it might be good to initialize them anyway.
> Especially since a couple of the drivers are I2C and I believe there's
> no similar patch for those. It shouldn't be difficult to come up with
> the corresponding patch, though.

I2C had the same actually for quite some time now.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/