[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP=VYLo047g+U3GJhkObJtNPubFNpHuGUJAF7oOh_7dPtSFd9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:31:55 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Get rid of cpuinit?
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wote:
>
> * Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:35:43PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > We have gotten rid of devinit markup. A recent patch of Linus' makes me
>> > wonder if we similarly should get rid of cpuinit markup?
>> >
>> > Just as with devices, the CPU hotplug machinery has been leveraged to
>> > support a number of pieces of functionality such as suspend, which means
>> > that on anything but the most embedded systems this functionality is
>> > likely needed anyway.
>> >
>> > On x86-64, for an "allyesconfig" build, the total amount of space in all
>> > the .cpu* sections combined is 100K.
>>
>> No objection from me on removing it, it just causes problems from what I
>> can tell.
>
> Indeed, there's a steady trickle of mis-annotated cpuinit sections, and no
> real tooling to make the annotations automatic or so in most of the cases.
> Manual simply does not seem to work in this case.
Is anyone actively working on weeding this out? If not, it is probably
one of those tree-wide kind of changes that I can volunteer to tackle...
Paul.
--
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
> --
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists