lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A4887BF146CD57468F700B415D2F47015A1315@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:53:21 +0000
From:	"Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish" <manishv.b@...com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com" 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] tps6507x-ts: Add DT support

Hi Dmitry,

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 23:33:11, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Manish,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:23:16AM +0000, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:34:42, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Hi Manish,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:24:17PM +0530, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +	struct touchscreen_init_data *init_data = NULL;
> > > > +	int err;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (node)
> > > > +		node = of_find_node_by_name(node, "tsc");
> > > 
> > > Why do you have to locate OF node manually instead of already having it attached to the device stucture?
> > 
> > As TPS6507x is mfd device containing two nodes, regulator and touchscreen.
> > It is necessary to use "of_find_node_by_name" to find child "tsc" node 
> > of TPS6507x MFD device.
> 
> I understand that TPS6507x is a MFD device, However, I still do not understand why you do not attach OF data to the child platform device representing touch screen when you create it.

I gone through most of MFD devices in mainline kernel where "of_find_node_by_name" 
function is used in order to populate child node properties. 
See below example of max8925 MFD device. 

Max8025 MFD device has following modules
1. Touch screen
2. Charger
3. Backlight
4. regulator

In DT case, device node for max8925 MFD device is in "arch/arm/boot/dts/mmp2-brownstone.dts" 
file having child nodes as regulator, backlight and charger.
Respective drivers (regulator, backlight and charger) of max8925 MFD device used 
"of_find_node_by_name" function in order to populate child node properties.

Here, also same case for TPS6507x MFD device

TPS6507x MFD device has two childs:
1. regulator
2. touch screen.

Regulator driver for TPS6507x is already in mainline and using function 
"of_find_node_by_name" to populate device tree properties for regulators.
On similar lines I used "of_find_node_by_name" to populate device
tree properties for touch screen.

Still, I agreed that it is possible to attach OF data to child platform device
but it requires changes in MFD driver of TPS6507x.

Please let me know your opinion about this.


Thanks, 
Manish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ