linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/32] ARM: ux500: Enable clocks for Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130613093410.GB16677@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:34:10 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mike.turquette@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] ARM: ux500: Enable clocks for Device Tree

On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> After this patchset has been applied, we can request clocks directly
> >> from Device Tree without using any AUXDATA device-name hacks. We also
> >> take care to remove all of thos at the end of the set.
> >
> > So it looks like Mike and Grant have okayed the actual design of this
> > patch-set, which is great. Is there any chance on some proper Acks from
> > Linus and Mike please?
> 
> I will get to it. Basically I don't see there is a hurry as this has
> no chance to hit the v3.11 merge window anyway so we'll have
> lots of time to discuss it.
> 
> Why 3.12: my five pull request for ux500 stuff to ARM SoC is still
> outstanding, and this stuff will clash with that unless we get
> a common merge base. So we have to wait for ARM SoC
> to settle at this point.

I understand, thanks for the clarification.

I'm fairly sure the semantics are sound, so I'll duplicate them for
the u8540 - working on that now.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/