linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51B99D0D.4050603@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:21:01 +0300
From:	Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@...com>
To:	<gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <balbi@...com>, <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
	<t-kristo@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032

On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@...mlogic.co.uk wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
>>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>
>>>
>>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
>>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
>>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in 
>>> line with
>>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
>>>
>>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
>>
>> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
>> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
>> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
>> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
>
> I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
>
> Graeme
>
Hello Mark, Graeme,

Taking in account that:
- there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
- there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes to 
twl6032 is not known;
- twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found on 
ti.com <http://ti.com>

So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?

// I apologize for sending personal e-mails, not to the mail list
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/