[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51B9B0F8.3070301@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:46:00 -0400
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@...allels.com>
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
avati@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: hold i_mutex in fuse_file_fallocate() - v2
On 06/13/2013 04:16 AM, Maxim Patlasov wrote:
> Changing size of a file on server and local update (fuse_write_update_size)
> should be always protected by inode->i_mutex. Otherwise a race like this is
> possible:
>
> 1. Process 'A' calls fallocate(2) to extend file (~FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE).
> fuse_file_fallocate() sends FUSE_FALLOCATE request to the server.
> 2. Process 'B' calls ftruncate(2) shrinking the file. fuse_do_setattr()
> sends shrinking FUSE_SETATTR request to the server and updates local i_size
> by i_size_write(inode, outarg.attr.size).
> 3. Process 'A' resumes execution of fuse_file_fallocate() and calls
> fuse_write_update_size(inode, offset + length). But 'offset + length' was
> obsoleted by ftruncate from previous step.
>
> Changed in v2 (thanks Brian and Anand for suggestions):
> - made relation between mutex_lock() and fuse_set_nowrite(inode) more
> explicit and clear.
> - updated patch description to use ftruncate(2) in example
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim V. Patlasov <MPatlasov@...allels.com>
> ---
Makes more sense and I like the cleanup... thanks.
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
> fs/fuse/file.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index e570081..35f2810 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -2470,13 +2470,16 @@ static long fuse_file_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
> .mode = mode
> };
> int err;
> + bool lock_inode = !(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) ||
> + (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
>
> if (fc->no_fallocate)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) {
> + if (lock_inode) {
> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> - fuse_set_nowrite(inode);
> + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
> + fuse_set_nowrite(inode);
> }
>
> req = fuse_get_req_nopages(fc);
> @@ -2511,8 +2514,9 @@ static long fuse_file_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
> fuse_invalidate_attr(inode);
>
> out:
> - if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) {
> - fuse_release_nowrite(inode);
> + if (lock_inode) {
> + if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
> + fuse_release_nowrite(inode);
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists