[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1371128589-8953-14-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:03:00 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, trenn@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
prarit@...hat.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [Part1 PATCH v5 13/22] x86, mm, numa: Use numa_meminfo to check node_map_pfn alignment
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
We could use numa_meminfo directly instead of memblock nid in
node_map_pfn_alignment().
So we could do setting memblock nid later and only do it once
for successful path.
-v2: according to tj, separate moving to another patch.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 10c6240..cff565a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -493,14 +493,18 @@ static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_memory(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
* Returns the determined alignment in pfn's. 0 if there is no alignment
* requirement (single node).
*/
-unsigned long __init node_map_pfn_alignment(void)
+#ifdef NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
+static unsigned long __init node_map_pfn_alignment(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
unsigned long accl_mask = 0, last_end = 0;
unsigned long start, end, mask;
int last_nid = -1;
int i, nid;
- for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, &nid) {
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+ start = mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ end = mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ nid = mi->blk[i].nid;
if (!start || last_nid < 0 || last_nid == nid) {
last_nid = nid;
last_end = end;
@@ -523,10 +527,16 @@ unsigned long __init node_map_pfn_alignment(void)
/* convert mask to number of pages */
return ~accl_mask + 1;
}
+#else
+static unsigned long __init node_map_pfn_alignment(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
- unsigned long uninitialized_var(pfn_align);
+ unsigned long pfn_align;
int i;
/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
@@ -538,24 +548,22 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
if (!numa_meminfo_cover_memory(mi))
return -EINVAL;
- for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
- struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i];
- memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, mb->nid);
- }
-
/*
* If sections array is gonna be used for pfn -> nid mapping, check
* whether its granularity is fine enough.
*/
-#ifdef NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
- pfn_align = node_map_pfn_alignment();
+ pfn_align = node_map_pfn_alignment(mi);
if (pfn_align && pfn_align < PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Node alignment %LuMB < min %LuMB, rejecting NUMA config\n",
PFN_PHYS(pfn_align) >> 20,
PFN_PHYS(PAGES_PER_SECTION) >> 20);
return -EINVAL;
}
-#endif
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+ struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i];
+ memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, mb->nid);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists