linux-kernel - [Part1 PATCH v5 14/22] x86, mm, numa: Set memblock nid later

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:03:01 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, trenn@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
	gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
	lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
	prarit@...hat.com
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [Part1 PATCH v5 14/22] x86, mm, numa: Set memblock nid later

From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>

In order to seperate parsing numa info procedure into two steps,
we need to set memblock nid later because it could change memblock
array, and possible doube memblock.memory array which will allocate
buffer.

Only set memblock nid once for successful path.

Also rename numa_register_memblks to numa_check_memblks() after
moving out code of setting memblock nid.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c |   16 +++++++---------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index cff565a..e448b6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -534,10 +534,9 @@ static unsigned long __init node_map_pfn_alignment(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 }
 #endif
 
-static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
+static int __init numa_check_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 {
 	unsigned long pfn_align;
-	int i;
 
 	/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
 	node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed;
@@ -560,11 +559,6 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
-		struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i];
-		memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, mb->nid);
-	}
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -601,7 +595,6 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 	nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
 	nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
 	memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
-	WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, MAX_NUMNODES));
 	numa_reset_distance();
 
 	ret = init_func();
@@ -613,7 +606,7 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 
 	numa_emulation(&numa_meminfo, numa_distance_cnt);
 
-	ret = numa_register_memblks(&numa_meminfo);
+	ret = numa_check_memblks(&numa_meminfo);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -676,6 +669,11 @@ void __init x86_numa_init(void)
 
 	early_x86_numa_init();
 
+	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+		struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i];
+		memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, mb->nid);
+	}
+
 	/* Finally register nodes. */
 	for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
 		u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn);
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/