linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Fix cpu check in task_bp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130613142026.GC16339@somewhere>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:20:28 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	trinity@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Fix cpu check in task_bp_pinned(cpu)

On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 08:21:20PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> trinity fuzzer triggered WARN_ONCE("Can't find any breakpoint slot")
> in arch_install_hw_breakpoint() but the problem is not arch-specific.
> 
> The problem is, task_bp_pinned(cpu) checks "cpu == iter->cpu" but
> this doesn't account the "all cpus" events with iter->cpu < 0.
> 
> This means that, say, register_user_hw_breakpoint(tsk) can happily
> create the arbitrary number > HBP_NUM of breakpoints which can not
> be activated. toggle_bp_task_slot() is equally wrong by the same
> reason and nr_task_bp_pinned[] can have negative entries.
> 
> Simple test:
> 
> 	# perl -e 'sleep 1 while 1' &
> 	# perf record -e mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10,mem:0x10 -p `pidof perl`
> 
> Before this patch this triggers the same problem/WARN_ON(), after
> the patch it correctly fails with -ENOSPC.
> 
> Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>

Looks good, thanks!

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>


> ---
>  kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> index ed1c897..29d3abe 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int task_bp_pinned(int cpu, struct perf_event *bp, enum bp_type_idx type)
>  	list_for_each_entry(iter, &bp_task_head, hw.bp_list) {
>  		if (iter->hw.bp_target == tsk &&
>  		    find_slot_idx(iter) == type &&
> -		    cpu == iter->cpu)
> +		    (iter->cpu < 0 || cpu == iter->cpu))
>  			count += hw_breakpoint_weight(iter);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 1.5.5.1
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/