linux-kernel - Re: cpu hotplug: possible_cpus broken (again?) next-20130607

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:36:16 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: cpu hotplug: possible_cpus broken (again?) next-20130607

On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 21:36 -0400, Youquan Song wrote:
> > > Interesting, you are changing long standing meaning of maxcpus=
> > > 
> > > We always use maxcpus=1 to have one cpu up, and later in user space
> > > to online other cpus like
> > > echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpuX/online.
> > > 
> > > aka maxcpus= is a soft limit or initial online nr.
> > > 
> > > we already have nr_cpus= for hard limit.
> > > 
> > > So need to drop
> > >  commit 3e275a5ba367ab74b3a4e49114307baed989fcac
> > >  Author: Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>
> > >  Date:   Fri Jun 7 10:07:08 2013 +1000
> > > 
> > >      drivers/base/cpu.c: fix maxcpus boot option
> > 
> > Agreed.
> 
> Yes. I also agree to drop it and the fix need more consideration.

Agreed.

> I try use maxcpus to limit cpu number to debug a well known applition 
> because it fail to run when cpu number is larger to > 69. 
> When I use maxcpus at to limit the boot CPUs number, but udev will 
> enable all of the CPUs at 3.10 kernel automatically. 
> I also try maxcpus at 3.0 kernel, it does not show the maxcpus issue. 

I tested Linus's 3.10-rc5 kernel on Fedora 18, but I did not see such
behavior.  Could this be related with your environment?

> I have digged out recently, it is the commit at 3.2 kernel
> 8a25a2fd126c621f44f3aeaef80d51f00fc11639 "cpu: convert 'cpu' and
> 'machinecheck' sysdev_class to a regular subsystem" result in udev
> automatically enable all of CPUs though maxcpus has been provided.
> 
> So the next, I need look at udev try to enable all of CPUs though
> maxcpus provided.  Possibly, it can also fix it in udev daemon.
> 
> Secondly, I think that the maxcpus= option description is too confused in
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt. The maxcpus and nr_cpus option need
> switch their name.

I am fine with the clarification.

> Currently:
> 
> 	maxcpus=	[SMP] Maximum number of processors that	an SMP kernel
> 			should make use of.  maxcpus=n : n >= 0 limits the
> 			kernel to using 'n' processors.  n=0 is a special case,
> 			it is equivalent to "nosmp", which also disables
> 			the IO APIC.
> 
> How about change to 
> 
> 	maxcpus=	[SMP] Maximum number of processors that	an SMP kernel
> 			bring up during booting.  maxcpus=n : n >= 0 limits the

bring -> brings

> 			kernel to using 'n' processors.  n=0 is a special case,
> 			it is equivalent to "nosmp", which also disables
> 			the IO APIC.


Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/