| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1371141152-9468-3-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:32:25 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Alexander E . Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [BUGFIX 2/9] ACPIPHP: fix device destroying order issue when handling dock notification
Current ACPI glue logic expects that physical devices are destroyed
before destroying companion ACPI devices, otherwise it will break the
ACPI unbind logic and cause following warning messages:
[ 185.026073] usb usb5: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[ 185.035150] pci 0000:1b:00.0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[ 185.035515] pci 0000:18:02.0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[ 180.013656] port1: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
Please refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=104321
for full log message.
Above warning messages are caused by following scenario:
1) acpi_dock_notifier_call() queues a task (T1) onto kacpi_hotplug_wq
2) kacpi_hotplug_wq handles T1, which invokes acpi_dock_deferred_cb()
->dock_notify()-> handle_eject_request()->hotplug_dock_devices()
3) hotplug_dock_devices() first invokes registered hotplug callbacks to
destroy physical devices, then destroys all affected ACPI devices.
Everything seems perfect until now. But the acpiphp dock notification
handler will queue another task (T2) onto kacpi_hotplug_wq to really
destroy affected physical devices.
4) kacpi_hotplug_wq finishes T1, and all affected ACPI devices have
been destroyed.
5) kacpi_hotplug_wq handles T2, which destroys all affected physical
devices.
So it breaks ACPI glue logic's expection because ACPI devices are destroyed
in step 3 and physical devices are destroyed in step 5.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Reported-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
Hi Bjorn and Rafael,
The recursive lock changes haven't been tested yet, need help
from Alexander for testing.
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index 02b0563..79c8d9e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct dock_station {
u32 flags;
spinlock_t dd_lock;
struct mutex hp_lock;
+ struct task_struct *owner;
struct list_head dependent_devices;
struct list_head hotplug_devices;
@@ -131,9 +132,13 @@ static void
dock_add_hotplug_device(struct dock_station *ds,
struct dock_dependent_device *dd)
{
- mutex_lock(&ds->hp_lock);
- list_add_tail(&dd->hotplug_list, &ds->hotplug_devices);
- mutex_unlock(&ds->hp_lock);
+ if (mutex_is_locked(&ds->hp_lock) && ds->owner == current) {
+ list_add_tail(&dd->hotplug_list, &ds->hotplug_devices);
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock(&ds->hp_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&dd->hotplug_list, &ds->hotplug_devices);
+ mutex_unlock(&ds->hp_lock);
+ }
}
/**
@@ -147,9 +152,13 @@ static void
dock_del_hotplug_device(struct dock_station *ds,
struct dock_dependent_device *dd)
{
- mutex_lock(&ds->hp_lock);
- list_del(&dd->hotplug_list);
- mutex_unlock(&ds->hp_lock);
+ if (mutex_is_locked(&ds->hp_lock) && ds->owner == current) {
+ list_del_init(&dd->hotplug_list);
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock(&ds->hp_lock);
+ list_del_init(&dd->hotplug_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&ds->hp_lock);
+ }
}
/**
@@ -355,7 +364,17 @@ static void hotplug_dock_devices(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event)
{
struct dock_dependent_device *dd;
+ /*
+ * There is a deadlock scenario as below:
+ * hotplug_dock_devices()
+ * mutex_lock(&ds->hp_lock)
+ * dd->ops->handler()
+ * register_hotplug_dock_device()
+ * mutex_lock(&ds->hp_lock)
+ * So we need recursive lock scematics here, do it by ourselves.
+ */
mutex_lock(&ds->hp_lock);
+ ds->owner = current;
/*
* First call driver specific hotplug functions
@@ -376,6 +395,8 @@ static void hotplug_dock_devices(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event)
else
dock_create_acpi_device(dd->handle);
}
+
+ ds->owner = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&ds->hp_lock);
}
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
index 716aa93..699b8ca 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(bridge_mutex);
static void handle_hotplug_event_bridge (acpi_handle, u32, void *);
static void acpiphp_sanitize_bus(struct pci_bus *bus);
static void acpiphp_set_hpp_values(struct pci_bus *bus);
+static void _handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
+ void *context);
static void handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *context);
static void free_bridge(struct kref *kref);
@@ -147,7 +149,7 @@ static int post_dock_fixups(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
static const struct acpi_dock_ops acpiphp_dock_ops = {
- .handler = handle_hotplug_event_func,
+ .handler = _handle_hotplug_event_func,
};
/* Check whether the PCI device is managed by native PCIe hotplug driver */
@@ -1065,22 +1067,13 @@ static void handle_hotplug_event_bridge(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
alloc_acpi_hp_work(handle, type, context, _handle_hotplug_event_bridge);
}
-static void _handle_hotplug_event_func(struct work_struct *work)
+static void _handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
+ void *context)
{
- struct acpiphp_func *func;
+ struct acpiphp_func *func = context;
char objname[64];
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
.pointer = objname };
- struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
- acpi_handle handle;
- u32 type;
-
- hp_work = container_of(work, struct acpi_hp_work, work);
- handle = hp_work->handle;
- type = hp_work->type;
- func = (struct acpiphp_func *)hp_work->context;
-
- acpi_scan_lock_acquire();
acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
@@ -1113,7 +1106,18 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_func(struct work_struct *work)
warn("notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n", type, objname);
break;
}
+}
+
+static void _handle_hotplug_event_cb(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct acpiphp_func *func;
+ struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
+ hp_work = container_of(work, struct acpi_hp_work, work);
+ func = (struct acpiphp_func *)hp_work->context;
+ acpi_scan_lock_acquire();
+ _handle_hotplug_event_func(hp_work->handle, hp_work->type,
+ hp_work->context);
acpi_scan_lock_release();
kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_func */
put_bridge(func->slot->bridge);
@@ -1141,7 +1145,7 @@ static void handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
* don't deadlock on hotplug actions.
*/
get_bridge(func->slot->bridge);
- alloc_acpi_hp_work(handle, type, context, _handle_hotplug_event_func);
+ alloc_acpi_hp_work(handle, type, context, _handle_hotplug_event_cb);
}
/*
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists